07 August 2011

More MLK on riots

This is starting to seriously bug me. Ever since the riot in Tottenham, many people who should know better have been circulating a "quote" from Martin Luther King Jr. that reads thus:


When you cut facilities, slash jobs, abuse power, discriminate, drive people into deeper poverty and shoot people dead whilst refusing to provide answers or justice, the people will rise up and express their anger and frustration if you refuse to hear their cries. A riot is the language of the unheard.



The first sentence of this is not a Martin Luther King quote. To the best of my ability to tell, it comes from Zita Holbourne, a performance artist and current member of the PCS national executive. The second sentence, as I pointed out in my previous note, is hugely out of context. Martin Luther King was an opponent of violent riots. If anything, he probably went too far the other way. Here's more of Martin Luther King on riots:


Now, let me rush on to say we must reaffirm our commitment to nonviolence. And I want to stress this. The futility of violence in the struggle for racial justice has been tragically etched in all the recent Negro riots. Now, yesterday, I tried to analyze the riots and deal with the causes for them. Today I want to give the other side. There is something painfully sad about a riot. One sees screaming youngsters and angry adults fighting hopelessly and aimlessly against impossible odds. And deep down within them, you perceive a desire for self-destruction, a kind of suicidal longing.

Occasionally, Negroes contend that the 1965 Watts riot and the other riots in various cities represented effective civil rights action. But those who express this view always end up with stumbling words when asked what concrete gains have been won as a result. At best, the riots have produced a little additional anti-poverty money allotted by frightened government officials and a few water sprinklers to cool the children of the ghettos. It is something like improving the food in the prison while the people remain securely incarcerated behind bars. Nowhere have the riots won any concrete improvement such as have the organized protest demonstrations.


And when one tries to pin down advocates of violence as to what acts would be effective, the answers are blatantly illogical. Sometimes they talk of overthrowing racist state and local governments and they talk about guerrilla warfare. They fail to see that no internal revolution has ever succeeded in overthrowing a government by violence unless the government had already lost the allegiance and effective control of its armed forces. Anyone in his right mind knows that this will not happen in the United States. In a violent racial situation, the power structure has the local police, the state troopers, the National Guard, and finally, the army to call on, all of which are predominantly white. Furthermore, few, if any, violent revolutions have been successful unless the violent minority had the sympathy and support of the non-resisting majority. Castro may have had only a few Cubans actually fighting with him and up in the hills, but he would have never overthrown the Batista regime unless he had had the sympathy of the vast majority of Cuban people. It is perfectly clear that a violent revolution on the part of American blacks would find no sympathy and support from the white population and very little from the majority of the Negroes themselves.


This is no time for romantic illusions and empty philosophical debates about freedom. This is a time for action. What is needed is a strategy for change, a tactical program that will bring the Negro into the mainstream of American life as quickly as possible. So far, this has only been offered by the nonviolent movement. Without recognizing this we will end up with solutions that don't solve, answers that don't answer, and explanations that don't explain. And so I say to you today that I still stand by nonviolence. And I am still convinced, and I'm still convinced that it is the most potent weapon available to the Negro in his struggle for justice in this country.


And the other thing is, I'm concerned about a better world. I'm concerned about justice; I'm concerned about brotherhood; I'm concerned about truth. And when one is concerned about that, he can never advocate violence. For through violence you may murder a murderer, but you can't murder murder. Through violence you may murder a liar, but you can't establish truth. Through violence you may murder a hater, but you can't murder hate through violence. Darkness cannot put out darkness; only light can do that.


And I say to you, I have also decided to stick with love, for I know that love is ultimately the only answer to mankind's problems. And I'm going to talk about it everywhere I go. I know it isn't popular to talk about it in some circles today. And I'm not talking about emotional bosh when I talk about love; I'm talking about a strong, demanding love. For I have seen too much hate. I've seen too much hate on the faces of sheriffs in the South. I've seen hate on the faces of too many Klansmen and too many White Citizens Councilors in the South to want to hate, myself, because every time I see it, I know that it does something to their faces and their personalities, and I say to myself that hate is too great a burden to bear. I have decided to love. If you are seeking the highest good, I think you can find it through love. And the beautiful thing is that we aren't moving wrong when we do it, because John was right, God is love. He who hates does not know God, but he who loves has the key that unlocks the door to the meaning of ultimate reality.



-- "Where Do We Go From Here", speech to the Southern Christian Leadership Convention, 16 August 1967

7 comments:

jens said...

The similarity between MLK’s analysis of violent revolution and chapter 1 of General Principles of Guerrilla Warfare is striking. Mind you, I think Che would agree that Tottenham is ill positioned to take over the world.

Anarchy Computer Corp. said...

Why don't you stick to stuff you about? You fuck all about Tottenham or the recent riots do you? And why are you being such an egotistical CUNT and jacking events in London when you're nowhere near? Dickhead.

Anarchy Computer Corp. said...

(sorry 'know about'.....)

Anarchy Computer Corp. said...

(and know fuck all)

Anarchy Computer Corp. said...

He's a wanker just a wanker, a total wanker and ya gonna regret being one! (add tune)

Anarchy Computer Corp. said...

YEP YOU@RE A PROPER CUNT. WASTE PEOPLES TIME AND THEY'LL WASTE YOURS TOO!

Coco said...

I am not a socialist. I am an American capitalist. Living as a child close to the LA-Watts riots in the 1960's children and adults of all races were afraid to sleep at night. We feared our homes would be broken into and that we would be drug out into the streets and murdered. Racists will always exist. Hopefully now that violant riots are considered acts of terrorism, in the United States-we will see less of them as a solution to any problem, because I do not know of any riot that helped anyone or anything in this country. Any person gathering angry individuals together to insite power and demand justice should be held accountable for the actions, including MLK.